1.Collegium recommends appointment of Justices N Kotiswar Singh, R Mahadevan as Supreme Court judges:- The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended Justices N Kotiswar Singh and R Mahadevan for appointment as judges of the Supreme Court of India. Their nominations are pending approval by the President of India, marking a significant step in bolstering the judiciary with experienced legal minds.
2.Registry can’t object to filing of fresh cases under old criminal laws:- Punjab and Haryana High Court:- The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that court registries cannot reject the filing of new cases under old criminal laws despite their potential repeal. This decision upholds the right to access justice under existing legal frameworks until they are formally replaced or amended by legislative changes.
3.Jharkhand High Court single-judge questions Division Bench decision to close contempt case against State AG:- In a notable development, a single-judge bench of the Jharkhand High Court has raised concerns over a Division Bench’s decision to close a contempt case against the State Attorney General. This move signals judicial scrutiny over the handling of contempt proceedings involving senior state officials, emphasizing accountability within the legal framework.
4.Soldiers under immense stress, unjust to dismiss CRPF officer for attempt to suicide:- Orissa High Court:- The Orissa High Court has intervened, criticizing the dismissal of a CRPF officer for attempting suicide, citing immense stress faced by soldiers. The court deemed the action unjust, highlighting the need for compassionate considerations in disciplinary actions against personnel experiencing mental health challenges.
5.Supreme Court grills ED for opposing bail restoration after one year of stay:- The Supreme Court criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for opposing the restoration of bail after a year-long stay. The court questioned the agency’s stance, highlighting procedural delays and emphasizing the need for fair and timely adjudication in legal proceedings.
6.Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes rape case, says complainant lodged FIR to extract money:- The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed a rape case, stating the complainant filed the FIR with intent to extort money. The court found insufficient evidence of rape and emphasized the misuse of legal provisions, highlighting concerns over false allegations in criminal cases.
7.Justice Amit Sharma of Delhi High Court recuses from hearing NIA appeal seeking death for Yasin Malik:- Justice Amit Sharma of the Delhi High Court has recused himself from hearing the NIA’s appeal seeking death penalty for Yasin Malik. The decision was made due to personal reasons, prompting the case to be transferred to another bench for further adjudication.
8.Free final order copy sent by Registry not certified copy, can’t be used for filing IBC appeals:- The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has ruled that a free final order copy sent by the Registry, which is not certified, cannot be used for filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). This decision underscores the requirement for certified documents in legal proceedings to ensure validity and authenticity.
9.Who told you Rameshwaram Café bombers were trained in Tamil Nadu? Madras High Court to Shobha Karandlaje:- Madras High Court questioned BJP leader Shobha Karandlaje over her statement alleging Rameshwaram Café bombers were trained in Tamil Nadu. The court sought clarification on the source of her claim, highlighting the need for accurate information in public statements regarding sensitive matters.
10.Airbag failure: Supreme Court rejects Mercedes Benz defence that seat belt was sufficient protection:- The Supreme Court dismissed Mercedes Benz’s argument that seat belts alone were adequate protection in airbag failure cases. The ruling emphasized the manufacturer’s duty to ensure safety features like airbags function properly, underscoring the importance of comprehensive safety measures in vehicles to protect occupants during accidents.
