1.Trust deficit in judiciary might push people to resort to mob justice: Justice BR Gavai:- Justice BR Gavai highlights the growing trust deficit in the judiciary, warning that it may drive individuals towards mob justice. He emphasizes the need for reforms to restore faith in legal institutions, citing the importance of laws such as the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Protection of Human Rights Act to ensure justice.
2.Is refusal to give mobile phone to police non-cooperation? Andhra Pradesh High Court answers:- The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that refusing to provide a mobile phone to police does not constitute non-cooperation. The court emphasized that individuals have the right to privacy and that compliance must be balanced with legal protections. This decision reinforces the importance of civil liberties in police investigations.
3.Why Delhi High Court refused to quash cruelty case against husband despite monetary settlement:- The Delhi High Court refused to quash a cruelty case against a husband, despite a monetary settlement between the parties. The court emphasized that domestic violence issues must be taken seriously, prioritizing public interest and the need to uphold legal protections for victims over private agreements.
4.This is the India we live in”: Supreme Court judge shows photo of menstruating woman forbidden to enter her house:- A Supreme Court judge highlighted a photo of a menstruating woman barred from entering her home, stating, “This is the India we live in.” The incident underscores ongoing issues of discrimination and cultural taboos surrounding menstruation, prompting a call for societal change and legal reforms to protect women’s rights.
5. CJI DY Chandrachud responds to criticism against Senior Advocate designations:- CJI DY Chandrachud addressed criticism regarding the designation of Senior Advocates, asserting that the process aims to recognize legal expertise and contribution to the profession. He emphasized the need for transparency and fairness in the selection process, advocating for reforms to ensure inclusivity and meritocracy within the legal community.
6.Establish Arbitration Council, monitor enforcement of arbitral awards: Justice PS Narasimha:- Justice PS Narasimha urged the establishment of an Arbitration Council to oversee the enforcement of arbitral awards. He emphasized that such a body would enhance the efficiency and credibility of arbitration in India, promoting quicker resolution of disputes and fostering a more robust framework for alternative dispute resolution.
7.Dearth of data on arbitration roadblock to frame policy: Justice Rajesh Bindal:- Justice Rajesh Bindal highlighted that the lack of comprehensive data on arbitration poses a significant challenge to formulating effective policy. He urged for systematic data collection to understand arbitration trends, which would aid in addressing issues, improving processes, and enhancing the overall framework for dispute resolution in India.
8.Governor bound by State’s decision on premature release of life term convicts:- The Supreme Court ruled that a Governor is bound by the state government’s decision regarding the premature release of life term convicts. This decision emphasizes the authority of state administrations in granting clemency, reinforcing the need for alignment between constitutional provisions and state-level policies on criminal justice.
9.”Blood boils:” Former ASG on misuse of ED, prolonged incarceration of PMLA accused:- Former Additional Solicitor General expressed outrage over the alleged misuse of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the prolonged incarceration of accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). He criticized the lack of timely trials, highlighting concerns over justice and civil liberties in the face of extensive legal delays.
10.Trust deficit in judiciary might push people to resort to mob justice: Justice BR Gavai:- Justice BR Gavai warned that a growing trust deficit in the judiciary could lead people to seek mob justice. He emphasized the urgent need for judicial reforms to restore public confidence, highlighting that a fair and efficient legal system is essential to prevent individuals from taking the law into their own hands.
