1.The Hindu journalist Mahesh Langa moves Gujarat High Court challenging remand in GST fraud case:- Mahesh Langa, a journalist from The Hindu, has approached the Gujarat High Court challenging his remand in a GST fraud case. He argues that the arrest violates his rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, emphasizing unlawful detention and lack of sufficient evidence, seeking immediate relief and bail.
2.Delhi High Court slams State for frivolous appeal against acquittal in attempt to rape case:- The Delhi High Court criticized the State for filing a frivolous appeal against the acquittal of an accused in an attempt to rape case. The court emphasized the importance of upholding judicial decisions and questioned the validity of the State’s arguments, calling for responsible use of legal resources.
3.Consumer forum orders IAS coaching centre to refund fee to student for misleading ad:- A consumer forum ordered an IAS coaching center to refund fees to a student after finding the institution guilty of misleading advertisements. The forum ruled that the center’s claims about success rates and course content were deceptive, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in educational marketing practices.
4.Allahabad High Court commutes death sentence of father, son in 19-year old murder case:- The Allahabad High Court commuted the death sentences of a father and son in a 19-year-old murder case, citing insufficient evidence and procedural flaws during the trial. The court highlighted the importance of fair trial standards, ultimately opting for life imprisonment instead of capital punishment in this prolonged case.
5.IndusLaw Partner Ravi Kumar moves to Ramanathan & Vahanvati:- IndusLaw partner Ravi Kumar has transitioned to Ramanathan & Vahanvati, bringing his extensive legal expertise in corporate law and mergers and acquisitions. His move is expected to enhance the firm’s capabilities and strengthen its presence in the legal market, reflecting Kumar’s commitment to delivering exceptional client service.
6.How will spouses satisfy sexual urges if not from each other? Allahabad High Court junks cruelty case:- The Allahabad High Court dismissed a cruelty case, highlighting that spouses should not expect to satisfy sexual urges solely from each other. The court emphasized the importance of understanding individual needs and circumstances in marriage, ruling that mutual consent and healthy communication are essential for a successful relationship.
7.Police not authorised to probe sex determination offence under PCPNDT Act: Allahabad High Court:- The Allahabad High Court ruled that police do not have the authority to investigate offences under the PCPNDT Act concerning sex determination. The court clarified that only designated authorities can conduct such inquiries, emphasizing the need for proper procedures to uphold the Act’s intent in preventing gender discrimination.
8.Jammu & Kashmir High Court seeks govt reply to plea challenging detention of Senior Advocate:- The Jammu & Kashmir High Court has sought a government response regarding a petition challenging the detention of a senior advocate. The plea argues that the detention violates legal rights and due process, prompting the court to call for clarification on the circumstances and justification behind the advocate’s detention.
9.Courts should be more strict in trademark violation cases of pharma products: Delhi High Court:- The Delhi High Court urged courts to adopt a stricter stance on trademark violation cases involving pharmaceutical products. Emphasizing the critical importance of protecting brand integrity and public health, the court highlighted that leniency in such matters could lead to consumer confusion and compromise the safety of medications.
10.Grooving head to music not stalking or attempt to interact with woman: Bombay High Court:- The Bombay High Court ruled that merely dancing or grooving to music does not constitute stalking or an attempt to interact with a woman. The court emphasized the importance of context, stating that such behavior should not be criminalized unless accompanied by clear intent to harass or intimidate.
