1.Tirupati Laddu controversy: Supreme Court orders probe by SIT under CBI supervision:- The Supreme Court has ordered a Special Investigation Team (SIT) under CBI supervision to probe the Tirupati Laddu controversy. This investigation, rooted in allegations of irregularities in the sale and distribution of sacred offerings, emphasizes adherence to the Endowments Act and principles of transparency and accountability in religious institutions.
2.Telangana High Court declines to stay single-judge’s ultimatum to Legislative Assembly Speaker:- The Telangana High Court has declined to stay a single judge’s ultimatum to the Legislative Assembly Speaker regarding the timely conduct of elections for local bodies. The court emphasized the need for adherence to democratic processes, reinforcing the importance of upholding electoral timelines as mandated by law.
3.TOLA overrides Income Tax Act on relaxing time for reassessment notices: Supreme Court:- The Supreme Court ruled that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act (TOLA) overrides the Income Tax Act regarding the relaxation of time for issuing reassessment notices. This decision clarifies TOLA’s precedence, ensuring taxpayers receive necessary relief during extraordinary circumstances affecting compliance timelines.
4.Antares Legal advises 360 One Asset on DailyObjects Series B fundraise:- Antares Legal has advised 360 One Asset Management on its Series B fundraising for DailyObjects. The legal firm provided strategic guidance throughout the fundraising process, enhancing compliance and regulatory aspects, and facilitating a successful capital infusion aimed at expanding DailyObjects’ market presence and product offerings in the consumer goods sector.
5.Supreme Court lawyers protest restriction of canteen menu during Navratri festival:- Supreme Court lawyers protested against restrictions on the canteen menu during the Navratri festival, arguing that it infringes on their rights to food choices. The protest highlights concerns over dietary freedom and cultural practices, emphasizing the need for inclusivity in public spaces, especially during significant religious observances.
6.Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea by Hashimpura convict seeking bail to repair his house:- The Supreme Court refused to entertain a plea from a Hashimpura convict seeking bail to repair his house. The court emphasized that personal circumstances do not override the seriousness of the conviction, reinforcing its stance on upholding judicial integrity and the rule of law in criminal matters.
7.Centre says Supreme Court can’t criminalise marital rape, married women already protected:- The Centre argues that the Supreme Court should not criminalize marital rape, asserting that married women are already protected under various laws, including Article 14, which ensures equality and protection against discrimination. The government believes existing legal frameworks adequately address concerns related to marital violence and abuse.
8.Delhi High Court disposes of Bhavik Koladiya suit against Ashneer Grover after settlement:- The Delhi High Court has disposed of Bhavik Koladiya’s suit against Ashneer Grover following a settlement between the parties. The court acknowledged the resolution of the dispute, concluding that both sides had reached an amicable agreement, thereby rendering further legal proceedings unnecessary. Details of the settlement remain private.
9.Allahabad High Court objects to UP lawyers holding condolence meetings during court hours:- The Allahabad High Court has objected to Uttar Pradesh lawyers conducting condolence meetings during court hours, emphasizing the need for maintaining court decorum and focus on legal proceedings. The court highlighted that such activities disrupt judicial functions and urged lawyers to adhere to professional responsibilities during designated court times.
10.Karnataka High Court stays order directing OLA Cabs to compensate woman for sexual harassment:- The Karnataka High Court has stayed a lower court’s order requiring OLA Cabs to compensate a woman for sexual harassment. The decision comes amid ongoing legal proceedings, with the High Court emphasizing the need for further examination of the case before finalizing any compensation obligations for the ride-hailing service.
