1.Orissa High Court grants bail to woman lawyer, fiance allegedly tortured at Odisha police station:- The Orissa High Court granted bail to a woman lawyer after she and her fiancé alleged torture by police at an Odisha station. The court criticized the police’s actions and emphasized the need for accountability in handling such cases, highlighting the importance of protecting individuals’ rights.
2.Rapid increase in consensual sexual relationships being registered as rape cases: Gujarat High Court:- The Gujarat High Court highlighted a concerning trend of consensual sexual relationships being misrepresented as rape cases. The court urged for a more discerning approach to such allegations, emphasizing the need to differentiate between consensual acts and genuine instances of coercion to protect the integrity of the legal system.
3.Karnataka High Court advises couple to seek guidance from spiritual guru to save marriage:- The Karnataka High Court advised a couple to consult a spiritual guru to help resolve their marital disputes. The court emphasized the potential benefits of spiritual guidance in fostering understanding and reconciliation, encouraging the couple to explore this option before pursuing further legal action in their ongoing separation case.
4.Justice V Srishananda of Karnataka High Court expresses regret for controversial comments:- Justice V. Srishananda of the Karnataka High Court expressed regret over controversial remarks made during a recent hearing. Acknowledging the impact of his comments, he emphasized the importance of judicial responsibility and sensitivity, reaffirming his commitment to upholding the dignity of the court and respecting public sentiment.
5.Missing trial court records: Allahabad High Court acquits man 42 years after conviction:- The Allahabad High Court acquitted a man 42 years after his conviction due to missing trial court records. The court highlighted the importance of maintaining accurate records in ensuring justice, ruling that the absence of evidence compromised the integrity of the original trial and necessitated the acquittal.
6.Woman’s body her own temple: Madhya Pradesh High Court refuses to accept compromise in rape case:- The Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasized that a woman’s body is her own temple while refusing to accept a compromise in a rape case. The court asserted that consent cannot be negotiated, reinforcing the legal system’s commitment to protecting women’s rights and upholding the seriousness of sexual violence.
7.Rouse Avenue Court takes cognisance of defamation complaint by Rajeev Chandrashekhar against Shashi Tharoor:- The Rouse Avenue Court took cognizance of a defamation complaint filed by Rajeev Chandrashekhar against Shashi Tharoor. Chandrashekhar alleged that Tharoor made defamatory statements affecting his reputation. The court will proceed with hearings, highlighting the ongoing legal tensions between the two politicians over the remarks in question.
8.Election of CM Siddaramaiah should be set aside since freebies for women discriminates against men: Karnataka High Court told:- The Karnataka High Court was urged to set aside Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s election, with claims that his government’s freebies for women discriminate against men. The petition argued that such policies violate principles of equality, raising questions about fairness in governance and the implications of targeted welfare measures in elections.
9.Centre notifies appointment of three new judges to Madras High Court:- The Centre has officially notified the appointment of three new judges to the Madras High Court. This move aims to enhance the court’s capacity to handle cases efficiently. The appointments are expected to contribute to the judicial system’s overall functioning and address the growing backlog of cases.
10.Judiciary Watch: Delhi High Court, Jharkhand High Court functioning without regular Chief Justices:- The Delhi High Court and Jharkhand High Court are currently operating without regular Chief Justices. This situation raises concerns about judicial efficiency and leadership. The absence of appointed Chief Justices may impact case management and overall court functioning, highlighting the need for timely appointments to maintain judicial stability.
