1.Trial courts’ reluctance to grant bail in significant cases symptomatic of a malaise: Kapil Sibal:- Kapil Sibal argues that trial courts’ hesitation to grant bail in high-profile cases reflects a deeper systemic issue. This reluctance reveals a troubling trend where judicial decisions are influenced more by public perception than by legal principles, undermining fairness and justice in the legal system.
2.Karnataka High Court extends interim relief granted to CM Siddaramaiah in MUDA scam:- The Karnataka High Court has extended the interim relief for Chief Minister Siddaramaiah in the MUDA scam case, preserving his protection from arrest. This extension follows his plea, invoking Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees protection against arbitrary detention. The court’s decision reflects ongoing judicial scrutiny in the matter.
3.Senior Advocates should hire juniors via applications, interviews instead of networks:- CJI DY Chandrachud:- CJI DY Chandrachud advocates for senior advocates to recruit junior lawyers through formal applications and interviews, rather than relying on personal networks. This approach aims to enhance meritocracy and transparency in hiring practices, aligning with the principles of equality and fairness in the legal profession.
4.Plea in Supreme Court against use of ‘Bulldozer Justice’ to target homes of accused:- A plea in the Supreme Court challenges the use of ‘Bulldozer Justice,’ where authorities demolish accused individuals’ homes as punitive measures. The petition argues this practice violates fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees protection against arbitrary punishment and ensures due process.
5.Karnataka High Court stays case against State IT Minister Priyank Kharge over 2022 protest march:- The Karnataka High Court has stayed the case against State IT Minister Priyank Kharge related to a 2022 protest march. The court’s decision halts proceedings, pending further legal review, addressing concerns about the fairness of the charges under scrutiny and ensuring due process under Article 21 of the Constitution.
6.MUDA scam: CM Siddaramaiah moves Karnataka High Court challenging Governor nod for prosecution:- In the MUDA scam case, Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah has challenged the Governor’s approval for his prosecution before the Karnataka High Court. Siddaramaiah argues that the Governor’s nod violates constitutional principles under Article 14, which ensures equality before the law, and disputes the legality of the prosecution process.
7.Allahabad High Court cautions against media posts that damage social fabric:- The Allahabad High Court has cautioned against media posts that harm societal harmony, emphasizing their potential to disrupt public peace. The court’s guidance aligns with Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 19(2) of the Constitution, which balance freedom of speech with maintaining public order.
8.Delhi High Court rejects plea against election of Nitish Kumar as JDU President:- The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea challenging Nitish Kumar’s election as JD(U) President. The court found no legal basis for the challenge, upholding the election process under the party’s constitution and relevant legal provisions, including principles of internal party democracy and Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.
9.Allahabad High Court imposes ₹1 lakh costs on man for maligning lawyers, district judges:- The Allahabad High Court has imposed ₹1 lakh in costs on a man for defaming lawyers and district judges. The court’s decision, under Section 35A of the Advocates Act, underscores the importance of upholding judicial dignity and preventing baseless attacks on legal professionals.
10.Bombay High Court slaps ₹50 lakh fine on Premier Stationery for Fevicol trademark violation:- The Bombay High Court has imposed a ₹50 lakh fine on Premier Stationery for violating Fevicol’s trademark. The ruling, under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, affirms that the unauthorized use of Fevicol’s mark infringes upon brand rights, emphasizing protection against trademark violations and upholding intellectual property laws.
