1.Badlapur Minor Assault: Bombay High Court takes suo motu cognisance:- The Bombay High Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the Badlapur minor assault case, highlighting serious concerns under Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, which mandates protection for minors. The Court emphasized the need for stringent legal action and thorough investigation in such sensitive matters.
2.Will State not take crimes against women seriously unless people protest? Bombay High Court:- The Bombay High Court questioned if the State only responds to crimes against women when faced with public protests. This remark came during a hearing on a high-profile case, reflecting concerns about the effectiveness and responsiveness of legal and administrative measures for protecting women’s rights and safety.
3.Cash for votes case: YSR Congress MLA withdraws plea in Supreme Court:- In the cash-for-votes case, YSR Congress MLA recently withdrew his plea from the Supreme Court. The plea sought to challenge the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s order under Section 482 of the CrPC, which aimed to quash criminal proceedings against him. The withdrawal ends the legal contest over the issue.
4.Gujarat High Court junks PIL for use of Gujarati in courts:- The Gujarat High Court dismissed a PIL seeking mandatory use of Gujarati in courts, citing procedural grounds and the absence of a legal mandate. The Court referred to the Official Languages Act, 1963, and the Constitution, which do not require exclusive use of regional languages in judicial proceedings.
5.Country’s economic interest cannot be equated to a bank’s financial health: Calcutta High Court:- The Calcutta High Court ruled that national economic interests cannot be equated with a bank’s financial health. This decision clarified that while banks are vital, their financial issues should not undermine broader economic policies or priorities, emphasizing the distinct roles of national and financial stability.
6.Ajmer sex scandal: POCSO court sentences six to life imprisonment after 32 years:- In the Ajmer sex scandal case, a POCSO court sentenced six individuals to life imprisonment after a 32-years legal battle. The verdict, under Section 376 of the IPC and relevant sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, addresses long-delayed justice for the victims.
7.Can woman awaiting divorce seek abortion due to change in marital status? Punjab and Haryana High Court answers:- The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that a woman awaiting divorce can seek an abortion due to changes in marital status. The decision, under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, recognizes the woman’s autonomy and evolving circumstances, ensuring access to abortion services in such situations.
8.Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of 3 lawyers as Delhi High Court judges:- The Supreme Court Collegium recommended appointing three lawyers as judges of the Delhi High Court. This move aims to fill vacancies and enhance the judiciary’s efficiency. The recommendations underscore the Collegium’s role in judicial appointments and its commitment to maintaining a balanced and capable judicial system.
9.”Where is the money coming from?” Supreme Court flags concerns over Bar body elections:- The Supreme Court raised concerns over the source of funds in Bar body elections, questioning transparency and legality. Under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and related regulations, the Court emphasized the need for clarity in financial disclosures to prevent corruption and ensure fair elections within legal institutions.
10.Narendra Dabholkar murder: Bombay High Court issues notice on appeal against acquittal of three accused:- The Bombay High Court issued a notice on an appeal challenging the acquittal of three accused in the Narendra Dabholkar murder case. The appeal seeks to overturn a lower court’s decision, alleging insufficient evidence led to the acquittal of the accused involved in the murder of the prominent activist.
