Existing Constitution Can’t Be Dismembered Under The Guise Of Amending It: Justice PV Sanjay Kumar

Introduction:

Begin with a brief introduction to Justice PV Sanjay Kumar and his position. Mention the context of his statement about the constitution.

Body:

1. Background of the Statement:

• Explain the circumstances or event where Justice PV Sanjay Kumar made this statement.
• Provide a summary of the context in which the statement was made.

1. Key Points of the Statement:

• Highlight Justice PV Sanjay Kumar’s main argument that amending the constitution should not lead to its dismemberment.
• Quote or paraphrase the specific points made by Justice Kumar regarding the sanctity of the constitution.

1. Analysis and Interpretation:

• Offer your analysis of why Justice Kumar might have made this statement.
• Discuss the implications of this statement in the context of constitutional law and governance.

1. Relevance to Current Issues:

• Explore how Justice Kumar’s statement is relevant to current legal or political debates.
• Provide examples or scenarios where attempts to amend the constitution could potentially undermine its foundational principles.

1. Legal and Constitutional Perspective:

• Explain the constitutional provisions related to amendments in India (assuming it’s about the Indian Constitution, based on Justice Kumar’s jurisdiction).
• Discuss any relevant legal precedents or interpretations related to amendments and the integrity of the constitution.

1. Conclusion:

• Summarize the key points of Justice PV Sanjay Kumar’s statement.
• Discuss the broader importance of respecting the constitution while amending it.