1.Supreme Court strikes down rules enabling caste discrimination in prisons:- The Supreme Court has struck down regulations that allowed caste discrimination within prison systems. The ruling emphasizes equality and human rights, mandating that all inmates be treated with dignity, irrespective of caste. This landmark decision aims to eliminate systemic biases and uphold the principles of justice and fairness in correctional facilities.
2.Rajasthan High Court initiates suo motu case after news report on homeless widow and 4 children:- The Rajasthan High Court has initiated a suo motu case following a news report about a homeless widow and her four children. The court expressed concern for their welfare and has ordered authorities to provide immediate assistance. This action underscores the judiciary’s commitment to addressing social injustices and protecting vulnerable families.
3.Arbitration in India like an overloaded truck struggling up the hill: Justice Hrishikesh Roy:- Justice Hrishikesh Roy likened arbitration in India to an overloaded truck struggling uphill, highlighting systemic inefficiencies and delays. He emphasized the need for legislative reforms, referencing the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to enhance the process, promote timely resolutions, and ensure that arbitration remains a viable alternative to litigation.
4.Maharashtra polls: Sharad Pawar moves Supreme Court against Ajit Pawar over clock symbol:- Sharad Pawar has approached the Supreme Court challenging the allocation of the clock symbol to Ajit Pawar in the Maharashtra elections. He claims that the symbol misrepresents their party’s identity and seeks legal intervention to restore the rightful emblem for his faction, emphasizing the need for electoral integrity.
5.Hema Committee report: A summary of events so far and what to expect next:- The Hema Committee was formed to address issues of caste-based reservation in India, assessing its impact on social justice. After reviewing various reports and public feedback, it aims to recommend policy reforms. The report will influence legislative changes, potentially revising the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, and shaping future reservations.
6.UP court says Muslim men targeting Hindu women through love jihad; sends youth to jail for life:- A Uttar Pradesh court sentenced a Muslim man to life imprisonment for his involvement in a “love jihad” case, asserting that he targeted a Hindu woman under false pretenses. The ruling invokes concerns over religious intermarriage, reflecting ongoing debates around the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.
7.Bombay High Court orders speedy probe into killing of Badlapur sexual assault accused:- The Bombay High Court has ordered a swift investigation into the killing of a sexual assault accused in Badlapur. The court emphasized the need for transparency and accountability, demanding a thorough inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the incident, highlighting concerns over vigilante justice and the protection of legal rights.
8.Prohibitory order on assembly of five or more people in Delhi withdrawn: Centre to Supreme Court:- The Centre informed the Supreme Court that the prohibitory order on assemblies of five or more individuals in Delhi has been withdrawn. This decision follows legal challenges regarding restrictions under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, aiming to balance public order with the right to assemble peacefully.
9.Supreme Court stays Madras High Court order against Isha Foundation, Sadhguru on mentioning of matter:- The Supreme Court has stayed a Madras High Court order against Isha Foundation and Sadhguru, related to the mention of a legal matter involving the organization. The stay allows the foundation to continue its activities without interruption, while legal proceedings regarding the case will be further evaluated by the apex court.
10.Kalkaji temple priest moves Supreme Court challenging prohibitory order in Delhi:- The priest of Kalkaji Temple has approached the Supreme Court to challenge a prohibitory order in Delhi restricting public gatherings. He argues that the order infringes on religious rights and the freedom to worship, urging the court to uphold the constitutional right to assemble for religious purposes.
