1.Courts, police not equipped to understand challenges faced by children with disabilities: CJI DY Chandrachud:- CJI DY Chandrachud emphasized that courts and police often lack the necessary understanding and resources to address the unique challenges faced by children with disabilities. He called for enhanced training and awareness to ensure these children’s rights and needs are effectively recognized and supported within the justice system.
2.Allahabad High Court moots contempt action against Senior Advocate who shouted at judges:- The Allahabad High Court proposed contempt proceedings against a senior advocate who shouted at judges during a hearing. The court expressed concern over the advocate’s conduct, emphasizing the need to maintain decorum and respect within the judicial process, highlighting the importance of upholding the dignity of the courtroom.
3.Justice BR Gavai bats for Bombay High Court Bench at Kolhapur:- Justice BR Gavai advocated for establishing a Bombay High Court Bench in Kolhapur to enhance access to justice for residents. He emphasized that the proposed bench would alleviate case backlog and improve legal services in the region, ensuring that justice is more accessible to the local population.
4.Laws protecting children with disabilities must be strictly implemented: Justice BV Nagarathna:- Justice BV Nagarathna stressed the importance of strict implementation of laws protecting children with disabilities. She highlighted that effective enforcement is crucial for safeguarding their rights and ensuring access to education, healthcare, and social services, ultimately promoting their inclusion and well-being in society.
5.Government order to block Hindutva Watch account unjustified: X to Delhi High Court:- X argued before the Delhi High Court that the government’s order to block the Hindutva Watch account was unjustified. The platform contended that such actions undermine freedom of expression and digital rights, asserting that the account played a vital role in promoting discourse on important social issues.
6.Supreme Court quashed ‘unique’ cruelty case filed by woman against in-laws:- The Supreme Court quashed a “unique” cruelty case filed by a woman against her in-laws, stating it lacked sufficient evidence. The court emphasized the need for concrete proof in such allegations and reiterated that mere accusations without substantiation cannot warrant legal action, highlighting the importance of justice and fairness.
7.Electoral Bonds Scheme: Bengaluru court sends complaint against Nirmala Sitharaman to police:- A Bengaluru court directed the police to investigate a complaint against Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman regarding the Electoral Bonds Scheme. The complaint alleges misuse of the scheme for political funding without transparency. The court’s decision emphasizes the need for accountability in electoral financing and adherence to democratic principles.
8.SCAORA Welfare Trust seeks contributions for flood relief in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana:- The SCAORA Welfare Trust has called for contributions to support flood relief efforts in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. The organization aims to assist affected communities by providing essential supplies and resources. They encourage individuals and organizations to contribute generously to aid those impacted by the devastating floods.
9.Take strict action against parents who take small children for protests: Kerala High Court:- The Kerala High Court urged strict action against parents who bring small children to protests, highlighting the potential dangers and psychological impact on minors. The court emphasized the need to protect children’s welfare and called for measures to ensure their safety during demonstrations, prioritizing their well-being over political activities.
10.Karnataka High Court stays hate speech case against anchor Rahul Shivshankar:- The Karnataka High Court granted a stay on the hate speech case against news anchor Rahul Shivshankar. The court found insufficient grounds for the charges, emphasizing the need for careful consideration in free speech cases. This decision allows Shivshankar to continue his work while the legal proceedings are reviewed.
