Friday, January 10, 2025
HomeUncategorizedTop 10 Legal News Of The Day

Top 10 Legal News Of The Day

1.Cabinet advice to not prosecute Siddaramaiah in MUDA case was copy-paste: SG Tushar Mehta to Karnataka High Court:- In a recent hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta claimed that the cabinet advice not to prosecute Siddaramaiah in the MUDA case was essentially a copy-paste job. This assertion was made during arguments in the Karnataka High Court, raising questions about the decision-making process in the case.

2.Supreme Court asks CBI to probe how Defence Colony RWA occupied Lodi-era Gumti tomb:- The Supreme Court has directed the CBI to investigate the Defence Colony RWA’s illegal occupation of the Lodi-era Gumti tomb. The Court’s order, invoking provisions under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, emphasizes the need to uphold heritage conservation laws and prevent unlawful encroachments.

3.CM Siddaramaiah plea against prosecution in MUDA scam case:- In a Karnataka High Court session, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s plea against prosecution in the MUDA scam was discussed. Siddaramaiah argues against the legality of his prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court is reviewing his arguments to determine the validity of the charges and legal procedures.

4.Gauhati High Court quashes CCI order imposing ₹5 lakh penalty on cement company:- The Gauhati High Court has overturned the Competition Commission of India’s ₹5 lakh penalty imposed on a cement company. The court found procedural lapses in the CCI’s decision, emphasizing the need for proper legal adherence in antitrust enforcement. The ruling impacts the company’s financial and regulatory status.

5.Relief for Future Lifestyle as NCLT denies lessor’s plea for return of unsold merchandise:- The NCLT has denied the lessor’s plea for the return of unsold merchandise from Future Lifestyle. This decision provides relief to the company, which is navigating financial difficulties and restructuring under insolvency proceedings. The ruling supports Future Lifestyle’s efforts to manage its inventory and financial obligations.

6.NCW asks Kerala government to submit Hema Committee report without redactions:– The National Commission for Women (NCW) has demanded that the Kerala government submit the Hema Committee report in full, without redactions. This request aims to ensure transparency and accountability in addressing issues related to the committee’s findings on women’s safety and welfare in the state.

7.Plea in Supreme Court against use of ‘Bulldozer Justice’ to target homes of accused:- A Supreme Court plea challenges the use of ‘Bulldozer Justice’ to demolish homes of accused individuals, arguing it violates legal principles and due process. The petition calls for judicial intervention to prevent punitive actions outside of legal proceedings and ensure fair treatment under the law.

8.72% judicial officers in Kerala are women; paints picture of promising judiciary: CJI DY Chandrachud:- Chief Justice DY Chandrachud highlighted that 72% of judicial officers in Kerala are women, reflecting a progressive shift in the judiciary. He praised this achievement under the framework of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, and emphasized its significance for gender equality and fair representation in the legal system.

9.Trial courts’ reluctance to grant bail in significant cases symptomatic of a malaise: Kapil Sibal:- Kapil Sibal criticized trial courts for their reluctance to grant bail in significant cases, describing it as indicative of a broader issue within the judicial system. He argued this trend undermines principles established under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, which mandates fair and prompt bail considerations.

10.LGBTQIA+ couples can open joint bank accounts; name partner as nominee: Central government:- The Central Government has announced that LGBTQIA+ couples can now open joint bank accounts and designate their partners as nominees. This policy change, reflecting a shift towards inclusivity, aligns with the principles of non-discrimination and equality under the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment on LGBTQIA+ rights.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments